Showing posts with label Facing change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facing change. Show all posts

Sunday, 21 August 2011

Facing change: Miriam


Preacher: Sue

At WGMC we've been looking at characters from the bible who faced change.  We chose this theme partly because this is a time of change for us.  The London Mennonite Centre has sold their building where we have held many church activities over many years and which holds many happy memories.  We thought we might find stories in the bible that would help us think about how to follow Jesus faithfully in these times of change.
Some weeks back I decided to preach on Miriam – and now I’m regretting that as I’m really not sure what to make of her story!  But let’s start with the easy bit, the early chapters of Exodus.

Reading: Ex 1:8- 2:10

Now a new king arose over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.  He said to his people, "Look, the Israelite people are more numerous and more powerful than we.  Come, let us deal shrewdly with them, or they will increase and, in the event of war, join our enemies and fight against us and escape from the land."  Therefore they set taskmasters over them to oppress them with forced labor. They built supply cities, Pithom and Rameses, for Pharaoh.  But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and spread, so that the Egyptians came to dread the Israelites.  The Egyptians became ruthless in imposing tasks on the Israelites, and made their lives bitter with hard service in mortar and brick and in every kind of field labor. They were ruthless in all the tasks that they imposed on them.  The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah, "When you act as midwives to the Hebrew women, and see them on the birthstool, if it is a boy, kill him; but if it is a girl, she shall live."  But the midwives feared God; they did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but they let the boys live.  So the king of Egypt summoned the midwives and said to them, "Why have you done this, and allowed the boys to live?"  The midwives said to Pharaoh, "Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women; for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes to them."  So God dealt well with the midwives; and the people multiplied and became very strong.  And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families.  Then Pharaoh commanded all his people, "Every boy that is born to the Hebrews you shall throw into the Nile, but you shall let every girl live."
Now a man from the house of Levi went and married a Levite woman.  The woman conceived and bore a son; and when she saw that he was a fine baby, she hid him three months.  When she could hide him no longer she got a papyrus basket for him, and plastered it with bitumen and pitch; she put the child in it and placed it among the reeds on the bank of the river.  His sister stood at a distance, to see what would happen to him.  The daughter of Pharaoh came down to bathe at the river, while her attendants walked beside the river. She saw the basket among the reeds and sent her maid to bring it.  When she opened it, she saw the child. He was crying, and she took pity on him. "This must be one of the Hebrews' children," she said.  Then his sister said to Pharaoh's daughter, "Shall I go and get you a nurse from the Hebrew women to nurse the child for you?"  Pharaoh's daughter said to her, "Yes." So the girl went and called the child's mother.  Pharaoh's daughter said to her, "Take this child and nurse it for me, and I will give you your wages." So the woman took the child and nursed it.  When the child grew up, she brought him to Pharaoh's daughter, and she took him as her son. She named him Moses, "because," she said, "I drew him out of the water."
Let’s think about who are the heroes and villains in this story.  Who do you think is the villain? 
Who is the hero? 
What do you notice about the heroes?
I love the central role the women play.  The midwives ignore Pharaoh’s instructions to kill all the Hebrew baby boys.  Moses’ mother cleverly follows the letter of the law by throwing Moses into the Nile as Pharaoh commands – but to give him the best possible chance of survival she first puts him in a basket that can float and puts it among the reeds to stop it getting washed away.
Then we meet Moses’ sister.  She’s not named but I’m going to assume this sister on the river bank is Miriam.  When Pharaoh’s daughter finds the baby, Miriam bravely rushes forward.  She talks as if Pharaoh’s daughter is going to keep the baby – maybe it’s even Miriam who gives her the idea.  Thinking on her feet, Miriam offers to find a Hebrew nurse.  She races home to fetch her mum and next thing we know Moses’ mother is not only looking after the child she so nearly lost but is actually being paid to do so.  And being paid by the daughter of the man who wanted the baby dead in the first place…  What a great way of resisting oppression and injustice! 
(As an aside, I’m intrigued by Pharaoh’s daughter too.  Surely she knew that her father was having Hebrew boys put to death.  She may well have guessed too that her adopted baby’s nurse is not some random Hebrew woman but the child’s own mother.  I wonder if this was her own resistance to her father’s cruelty?)
Anyway, we should get back to Miriam… 
We meet her next just after the Israelites have escaped from slavery in Egypt and have seen the army that was pursuing them drowned by the sea they themselves had just crossed safely.  I guess this may raise some uncomfortable questions for us about the deaths of the Egyptian men and horses, but of course the Israelites hadn’t come across Jesus and his awkward teaching about loving your enemy.  Besides, they had just escaped by the skin of their teeth from an army which would probably have slaughtered them if they hadn’t drowned first.
So they were ecstatic and Moses led the people in singing – then Miriam led the women in dancing and singing: Exodus 15:20-21 tells us “the prophet Miriam, Aaron's sister, took a tambourine in her hand; and all the women went out after her with tambourines and with dancing.  And Miriam sang to them: "Sing to the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously; horse and rider he has thrown into the sea.” 
So Miriam is a prophet, an inspiring leader, followed by all the women.
Micah 6:4 underlines this:  “For I brought you up from the land of Egypt, and redeemed you from the house of slavery; and I sent before you Moses, Aaron, and Miriam.”  The resecue from Egypt is a defining story for the Israelites.  And here in Micah the sending of Miriam (and Moses and Aaron) is right up there with the Exodus as a demonstration of how much God loves Israel.  It makes me wonder whether there aren’t some other amazing stories of what Miriam did, how she led the people, which have got lost over the centuries as those who wrote the bible focused so much on male leaders and prophets.
But I wonder how things were for Miriam as the weeks and months of wilderness wandering wore on.  The bible only really gives us one more glimpse of her and this is where it all gets a bit puzzling.  Let’s hear the story.

Reading: Numbers 12:1-16

While they were at Hazeroth, Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite woman whom he had married (for he had indeed married a Cushite woman); and they said, "Has the Lord spoken only through Moses? Has he not spoken through us also?" And the Lord heard it.  Now the man Moses was very humble, more so than anyone else on the face of the earth.  Suddenly the Lord said to Moses, Aaron, and Miriam, "Come out, you three, to the tent of meeting." So the three of them came out.  Then the Lord came down in a pillar of cloud, and stood at the entrance of the tent, and called Aaron and Miriam; and they both came forward.  And he said, "Hear my words: When there are prophets among you, I the Lord make myself known to them in visions; I speak to them in dreams.  Not so with my servant Moses; he is entrusted with all my house.  With him I speak face to face—clearly, not in riddles; and he beholds the form of the Lord. Why then were you not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?"  And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them, and he departed.  When the cloud went away from over the tent, Miriam had become leprous, as white as snow. And Aaron turned towards Miriam and saw that she was leprous.  Then Aaron said to Moses, "Oh, my lord, do not punish us for a sin that we have so foolishly committed.  Do not let her be like one stillborn, whose flesh is half consumed when it comes out of its mother's womb."  And Moses cried to the Lord, "O God, please heal her."  But the Lord said to Moses, "If her father had but spit in her face, would she not bear her shame for seven days? Let her be shut out of the camp for seven days, and after that she may be brought in again."  So Miriam was shut out of the camp for seven days; and the people did not set out on the march until Miriam had been brought in again.  After that the people set out from Hazeroth, and camped in the wilderness of Paran.
Let’s ask the same questions again.  Who are the heroes and villains here? 
Well, to me this is a much more puzzling passage.
What is even going on here?  What are Miriam and Aaron complaining about?  Is Moses wife the same wife (Zipporah) as we’ve already met a couple of times in the book of?  Or is it a new wife?  Are they angry with Moses’ wife?  Or are they angry with Moses?  Maybe they don’t think he’s treating her well?   It’s often said that Moses’ Cushite wife was probably black.  Does this mean Miriam and Aaron are being racist and having a go at her in a very nasty way? 
And what do we make of Aaron’s & Miriam’s complaint that God has spoken through them as well as Moses?  Are they right to be feeling overlooked and aggrieved?  I wonder whether Miriam at least was getting a lower profile than she deserved.  Perhaps Moses DID have a habit of squeezing Aaron and Miriam out of the picture.  It’s hard to tell.  The text is very pro Moses but then it was handed down and written down by a long line of people who had looked to Moses as THE great prophet and leader of his people.  And we do know from a story in Exodus that Moses’ father-in-law had to teach him about sharing responsibility as he tended to be a bit of a one-man show.  And one of Miriam’s gifts seemed to be precisely NOT being a one-woman show – as she led all the women joined in singing and dancing.
And why did Miriam get punished and Aaron apparently not?  It seems unfair and hard to explain.  And what do we make of an account of God punishing someone this way, even if she is restored a week later?
Well, I don’t have answers for these questions and it’s hard to be sure how fair the writer is being to Miriam, but I do have a few reflections both on how Miriam dealt with change and how she handled conflict.
The first is that is doesn’t matter how much you have served God in the past – you may even have been well-known and respected for your prophetic ministry or your leadership – you still need to carry on being faithful.  Miriam has been bold and faithful in the past but that doesn’t give her permission to switch off now and just do what she wants.  Maybe Miriam found it relatively easy to be faithful and obedient in the midst of the challenge and drama of rescue from Egyptian slavery but finds it harder to keeping going weeks or months later.  Maybe she was good at dealing with exciting change but less good when times of high drama changed into days of repetitive routine.  There are probably moments for us all when with God’s grace we rise to a challenge but often it’s harder once things calm down and the new challenge is being faithful in small things day by day.  Perhaps that’s been the experience of the young people and organisers of Junior Apprentice – a real sense of being close to God during that week and a struggle to stay in touch with God in daily life once it was all over.
It’s not just how you start that counts but also how you finish.  Of course that applies in visible projects, maybe in school or at work or in church which it’s easy to start with enthusiasm and finish with bitter complaining – or not finish at all! - but I think it counts hour by hour too. 
My husband Peter loves playing complicated board games frequently and for hours at a time.  I quite like playing short easy board games occasionally…  You can probably already see where this is going…
Sometimes, especially if Peter is feeling a bit low, in a surge of love and generosity I offer to play a game with him – but then spend so much of the game sighing and groaning about how difficult it is that the game is ruined for Peter!  So I need to learn to finish as well as start… 
Or take some other examples.  How many of you have just got exam results? 
With most exams, once you pass you’ve always passed – if your filing is good you can hang on to the certificate for the rest of your life.  If you run you’re only as fit as your last few weeks of training.  And I imagine that even the amazing young musicians we have here today are only as skilled as their last few months of practice and performance. 
I think the Christian life is more like running or playing an instrument than doing an exam.  You can’t just put previous highs of serving God or sensing God’s presence in your pocket – or your filing cabinet – and then feel free to be mean and divisive later in life because you’ve already done the following Jesus bit. 
I wonder whether Miriam has also seen her role or her position changing – or at least feels that she’s not being appreciated.  And we will probably often face changes in our roles.  In both our congregations people come in and out of leadership - Baptist deacons and Mennonite elders step down and return to being ordinary members of the congregation.  Or perhaps people who’ve been leaders in other churches or still are leaders at work are part of a church where they have less responsibility or a lower profile.  Or perhaps we change role as we move to a new place or change church, school or job, retire or, in this economic climate, lose a job.  What could we learn from Miriam?
Well, I have quite a bit of sympathy with Miriam.  And I certainly don’t think this passage is telling us not to challenge our leaders or that when we do the leaders should clamp down hard.  Notice that it’s not Moses who reproves Miriam and Aaron, it’s God.  It’s not up to Moses to squash Miriam and Aaron’s challenge.
But I do think Miriam and Aaron get several things wrong.  Let’s have a look.
What do you think they are really bothered about? 
What do they say to Moses?
Let’s look more closely at what they do.  They talk with each other behind Moses’ back.  And when they do speak to Moses they don’t actually say they’re unhappy that they’re not being given enough responsibility or recognition.  They go off on a completely different tack, making a complaint related to his wife.  I wonder what would have happened if they’d come to Moses individually with their real grievance. 
I think there are lessons here for all of us about disagreements and disappointments and conflict – in the church and elsewhere. 
The Israelites were facing a lot of change.  It was a tough time for the whole people and for the leaders.  This was bound to bring strains in relationships. 
How Miriam and Aaron deal with this is unhelpful in at least three ways.  Firstly, they talk to each other before they talk to Moses.  They feed each other’s grievance.  The Mennonite congregation has for many years tried to follow the pattern for dealing with disagreements which Jesus talks about in Matthew 18.  Verse 15 says “If another member of the church sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone.”  It’s hard to stick to that but it’s an important principle.  Instead Miriam and Aaron decided to have a good moan behind Moses’ back.
The second unhelpful thing is what they say to Moses.  They don’t mention the thing they are really unhappy about - unless perhaps they’re complaining that Moses’ wife is taking some of their role.
And the third thing is that they turn the focus on Moses and attack him rather than talk about what they are finding hard and what they want to happen.  They’re annoyed with him so they look around for an excuse to have a go at him.  (Now that’s a temptation I recognise…)
So instead of going to Moses individually and saying “I’m unhappy at losing my role and not being properly appreciated, and I would like us to find a way of dealing with that”, they talk behind his back, go to him with a different issue and then make it all about Moses: “you are getting things wrong, you are at fault”.
These are real temptations at the best of times but I think it’s particularly easy to fall into these traps when there is lots of change around us or when our role is changing, particularly when we are feeling more on the fringes than we used to.
Reflecting on our two congregations, I think there is change for both, now and ahead of us.  As Mennonites we are working out life without the London Mennonite Centre building and with a less close relationship with the Centre.  Maybe we feel a bit like Miriam.  As Baptists you face change now as you continue to open yourselves and your premises as widely as you can to the community and more change in the future when you appoint a minister.
So in spite of my many unanswered questions I hope we can learn from Miriam and her story.  Miriam was brave and creative in a crisis.  She undermined Pharaoh’s cruelty by setting up a subversive childcare arrangement for her brother.  She thanked God wholeheartedly, caught the spirit of a whole community and inspired them in worship.  And she made some mistakes in the way she tackled conflict at a time of change and disappointment.  Maybe we can commit ourselves again to the pattern of Matthew 18, aiming to talk privately with someone we have a difficulty with – including our leaders - with them not about them behind their back and to being honest about our struggles, not just finding an excuse to attack other people.  In doing that we may find that we are learning both from Miriam and from Jesus.

Sunday, 24 July 2011

Facing Change: Mark


Preacher: Peter

Readings

Acts 12.25-13.13
Acts 15.36-41
Col 4.10-11

Introduction

Change is not always something imposed on me from the outside – a change in where I live or who I live with or how I earn a living for example. It can be even tougher to deal with an internal change – a sudden change in my picture of myself, who I am, or what my future holds.  I will be talking today about Mark, a young man we meet in the pages of the New Testament who suddenly, and irrevocably,  lost his vision of his identity and his future, and replaced it with – what?

Mark’s background

At the time of our readings from Acts, John Mark was an educated young man from a respectable and well-to-do Jewish family. His mother, Mary, owned a large home in Jerusalem - roomy enough for “many” Christians to gather in for prayer (Acts 12.12). And his cousin Barnabas was a wealthy landowner and a Levite. He had a latin name (Marcus) as well as a Jewish one (Johanan), so was perhaps equally at home in the Jewish and gentile cultures of his day. It seems likely that in his youth he was associated with the circle of Jesus’ followers. If indeed he was the young man who fled naked from the mob in Gethsemene (Mark 14.51) then he witnessed the terrible events of Jesus’ passion in Jerusalem.

Paul’s First Journey

We find him a few years later in the flourishing church at Antioch, having been collected from Jerusalem by Paul and Barnabas, clearly singled out for great things. When the Holy Spirit calls the two apostles to set out on their first evangelistic foray into the Eastern Mediterranean, without hesitation they choose Mark “to assist them”. We can only guess at the qualities which led to him being selected by the great men: his education perhaps, or his inter-cultural ease, or his youthful enthusiasm?

All goes well at first. They have a torrid time in Cyprus, confronting both black magic and Roman power, before they turn their eyes to bigger prizes and set sail for mainland Asia Minor.

And it’s here that Mark turns out to be a big disappointment, to himself probably as much as anyone else. He decides to go back home. We can only guess at his reasons. Was he shocked and a little scared by the dramatic events on Cyprus? Was Paul proving difficult to live with day-in day-out? Was he just homesick? Or could you put a more simple, ugly label on his behaviour – cowardice? He was given this amazing, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, he thought he had the enthusiasm and energy and courage for it, but when it came to it – he gave up.

A personal aside

It’s painful for me to think about Mark’s story, because it reflects my own. Aged twenty I was a medical student at Oxford University. I’d just been offered a place at Cambridge to do my clinical degree. A vision of a golden life lay before me, within my grasp. And for reasons which with hindsight now seem stupid or cowardly, I gave up.  I’ve often bitterly regretted that foolish decision of my youth. A wonderful opportunity which seemed to drop so easily into my hands, turned out to be strictly a one-off – once lost, impossible to recover.

God of Second Chances

But God is the God of second chances, right?

Barnabas seems to think so. He and Paul are back in Antioch, planning their second journey back to Asia Minor, visiting the churches they planted on their first trip, and perhaps planting a few more. Barnabas tells cousin Mark not to feel sad, he’ll have a word with Paul. After all, Paul’s a great believer in God’s grace - he’s sure to give Mark a second chance. Hope swells in Mark’s heart.

But it turns out Paul is also a great believer in assembling a reliable team, and as far as he’s concerned Mark is tainted with unreliability. He’s not willing to take the risk.

Even worse, this leads to a “sharp disagreement”. Now Mark has dragged Barnabas into his failure. Thanks to Mark, Paul and Barnabas will never work together again.

This is the crunch point, where Mark has to face the fact that he is not and never will be the great evangelist that he dreamed he would. And his future will not be what he imagined and dreamed of – sharing the apostle Paul’s great adventure, taking the gospel, in the face of terrifying opposition, across the Roman Empire to Rome itself. That identity, and that future, could have been, but now – thanks to Mark’s loss of nerve - never will be. Nobody else did this to him, he did it to himself. And God is not going to make everything all right and produce a second chance for him.

Yes, he goes off to Cyprus with Barnabas and does some useful work. But it’s definitely small time, not big time. It’s not storming the Empire with Paul.

A corporate aside

I’m sure I don’t need to labour the resonance between this point in Mark’s story, and the point we find ourselves at in Wood Green Mennonite Church’s story. We had a vision of our identity and future that has been shaken. We had a picture of our future stretching decades ahead, of ourselves in a warm ongoing relationship with the London Mennonite Centre and that wonderful house on Shepherd’s Hill. And a sense of our own identity as a church that was both enabled and constrained by that relationship. That has all gone now, and we are left wondering: what is our identity and future now?

So with this in mind, let’s go back to Mark, eating his heart out over his lost opportunities....

Something else

....something else happens.

It often does.

Years later we find Mark, now well into his middle years, in Rome, and – what a surprise this is! - reconciled with Paul. Paul is in prison, and Mark is one of his inner circle, one of only three Jewish friends standing alongside him in his trouble. Mark, says Paul, has “been a comfort to me”(Col 4.11) and “is very useful to me” (2 Tim 4.11), and is the apostle’s trusted messenger, running errands for him to places like Colossae. Paul, maybe humbled a little by his experience of imprisonment, has come to see that Mark has some value after all.

In Rome Mark is also highly valued by Peter, who regards him as “my son” (1 Pet 5.13).  And through this association, Mark finds himself engaged in a new task that he probably never imagined in his enthusiastic youth. Irenaeus tells us that “after their departure [ie the deaths of Paul and Peter] Mark, Peter’s disciple, has himself delivered to us in writing the substance of Peter’s preaching”. So Mark becomes the writer of  his gospel, a gloriously immediate, exciting and memorable piece of storytelling which belongs with the great works of  world literature, and has arguably done more to acquant people with Jesus down the centuries than even the apostle Paul ever did.

So Mark turned out to be an evangelist after all.

I take two things from this.  Firstly: we don’t always value our own talents, we value much more highly the things that we find difficult, the skills that we struggle to acquire. My son Gavin has a gift for drawing, always has. From a young age he has been able to draw a lifelike representation of pretty much anything you can place before him.  But he’s never done anything with it – my guess is that it comes so easily to him he hardly thinks of it as a talent at all. And I wonder if Mark was the same – thanks to his privileged background he was always able to write, and write well. But in his youthful idealism he didn’t want to be a writer, he wanted to be the missionary church planter – a vocation that, as it turned out, he was not so well suited for. Writing seemed too easy to be exciting. Even so, it turned out to be his life’s work, the thing he was born for.

Secondly: Mark did not retreat into middle-aged cynicism. I guess most of us have met people like this, who talk with world-weary irony of their own youthful idealism. Maybe I am sometimes tempted to talk like that myself. But Mark’s gospel, written in his fifties or even his sixties, is a young man’s book, and his Jesus is every inch the idealistic young man, rushing hastily from one confrontation with evil to another, not a minute to lose, burning with the urgency of his mission. Despite the bitter disappointments that life, or more accurately Mark himself, had dealt out to him, Mark never abandoned his youthful love for Jesus and enthusiasm to serve him.  May I be able to say the same of myself. Amen.

Sunday, 12 June 2011

Facing change: Lot and Hagar

Preacher: Veronica

God called Abram from his home to a new land; Abram was old and he faced many difficulties but he was given a promise and a new name, and he eventually made it to the new land.

That’s actually got nothing to do with what I’m going to speak about today - it’s just by way of explaining why I’m not going to preach on Abraham. We all know the story too well, we’ve been reading it since Sunday school and whenever we want to think about going forward in faith, we turn to Abraham and come up with something everyone’s heard before. So I’m not preaching on Abraham, or even on Sarah, which would at least have the virtue of being less hackneyed.

Instead I want to look at two characters in the circle around Abraham; people who were caught up in his call and who had to uproot with him even though they themselves hadn’t had a special call from God. They were, if you like, the unwilling travellers in faith, who found circumstances overtaking them and responded to them as best they could.

The first of these characters is Lot. The earliest mention we have of Lot is in Genesis 11 where the Bible has him travelling to Haran with his grandfather Terah and his uncle Abram. There is no mention yet of a particular call to Abram and at this stage we might think of them as economic migrants, or indeed nomadic herders. However it’s also possible that Ur, where they originated, was a wealthy city and so they were in fact already well settled and lived an urban life. We know from Genesis 13, just before the passage we heard, that ‘Abram was very rich in livestock, in silver and in gold’ but we don’t know whether he already had all this wealth when he left Ur, or whether he acquired it during his stay in Haran. Lot may have followed him because his economic security was tied up with Abram’s. Ultimately we can’t tell whether Lot went with Abram willingly or unwillingly but every reference to the story elsewhere in the Bible refers to the faith of Abraham, not the faith of Lot. So we could see Lot as no more than a fellow traveller, in both the literal and political senses of that phrase.

Now here’s where it gets interesting. After a brief and not very happy diversion to Egypt, Abram and all those with him have arrived for a second time at the borders of the promised land. But Abram (who has not acquired his new name yet), and Lot seem to be in competition for the same grazing land. Fights are breaking out between Abram’s herders and Lot’s herders; you can just imagine what chaos must have ensued when they both tried to drive their animals onto the same land. A conservative government might have called it healthy competition, but it’s more like dog eat dog, or maybe sheep eat sheep.

Abram doesn’t want to be in conflict with his own nephew, so he suggests a solution. There is plenty of land open to them, so he suggests that they split up; and very generously, Abram gives Lot first choice of land. Now Lot, who is not renowned for his faith, probably has an eye to the main chance. So he takes a good look around and sees that the river plain is fertile and well irrigated. It’s a natural choice. But what the narrator knows, and we know, but Lot doesn’t yet know, is that Sodom, where he settles, is a place with a corrupt and callous culture.

A side note: before we get caught up in the usual stereotype of what Sodom’s wickedness consisted of, we should listen to a verse from Ezekiel:

Ezekiel 16:49

There’s absolutely no mention of homosexuality here, just a city that prides itself on its luxuries and comforts, and doesn’t give a fig about the plight of those of its citizens who are in need.

Back to Lot. We know very little about him, or how historically accurate the Bible stories of him are, but he strikes me as an example of one way to respond to change in our lives. He is the person who takes things into his own hands, who does everything he can to make the new situation as close to the old situation as possible. In Haran, or perhaps even back in Ur, he had fertile land and a good living. He is going to make absolutely sure that he gets the same in or near Canaan. In effect he’s saying, as I once posted in my Facebook status, ‘I like change, so long as it’s the kind of change I like’.

It’s a very understandable response; one which I am often guilty of myself. In my father’s speech at Ed’s and my wedding (which incidentally was written by my mother!) my dad said it was nice to be a complete family again. He was referring to the death of my brother in 1975, and saying that welcoming Ed into the family was like bringing things closer to what they used to be. Most of us, except those who have had bad old days, secretly would like to restore things to the way they were in the good old days.
As for myself, I had ten years in which I would go to the LMC for tea every Friday on my way to my therapist in Tufnell Park. This was my Friday routine, set in stone. When that therapist died and I went to a new therapist, the timing didn’t work out the same, because I saw her in the morning and it was just too late to get to the LMC for coffee. So I’m very pleased that I now see a therapist in Archway, at a time when it just works out for me to go to tea at the LMC after I’ve seen her. Things are almost back to the way they used to be. But I’m also aware that soon there won’t be any tea at the LMC to go to and I shall have to go to a cafĂ© and be tempted by the cup cakes.

For many of us, when things change, our first response is to see how we can arrange it so that they end up not too different from the way they were before. But we need to bear in mind that for Lot, that meant he ended up in a place which was far more dangerous for him and his spiritual welfare, than if he’d just embraced change fully and gone into Canaan with Abram. And his subsequent history is no more edifying, involving drunkenness and incest with his daughters.

Now I want to look at our second character, Hagar. Can we have the first reading from Genesis 21 please?

Genesis 21:8-16

This is much later, when not only the promise of a land, but the promise of a son, have been given to Abram who is now called Abraham. Actually, prior to this, Abram has taken quite a Lot-like decision, in sleeping with Sarah’s servant Hagar and having a son with her, Ishmael. Because the promised offspring with Sarah had not turned up yet, he decided to take matters into his own hands. In fact this was Sarah’s own suggestion, but he didn’t have to listen to her.

So when we speak of the faith of Abraham, we need to remember that his faith was actually quite flawed. And indeed we see this earlier in Genesis 12, when he goes walkabout to Egypt instead of staying in Canaan, and pretends Sarah is his sister, to avoid the Egyptians killing him and taking her.

But now the promise has finally come true, Abraham has a son by Sarah. And according to which translation you follow, Hagar’s son Ishmael either ‘plays with’ that son Isaac, or ‘mocks’ him. If he is indeed teasing Isaac, then Sarah is understandably upset. But we know that Sarah has already resented Hagar for a long time; and to be fair, Hagar did invite some of this feeling by ‘looking with contempt’ on Sarah when she had a son and Sarah didn’t. So now Sarah prevails on Abraham yet again, forcing him to drive Hagar away into the desert.

Although Hagar has run away from Abraham and Sarah before, God met her in the wilderness, and she obeyed God’s call to her to return to them. It must therefore seem very cruel to her that God has now allowed her to be cast out of the very place she returned to in obedience to God. And whereas on her first time in the desert she found a water source, now she has only the limited supply of water she has brought, and a bit of bread. Also, when she ran away before, she didn’t even know yet that she was pregnant with Ishmael. But now Ishmael is a young boy, and she has no means of feeding him or giving him drink. All she can do is to watch him die - and since she can’t bear to do that, she hides him under a bush and walks away from him. Actually the timing’s a bit confused here, because Genesis 17 tells us that Ishmael is already thirteen when Abraham receives the promise of Isaac. Yet this later story suggests he is still a young child. But either way, there is no sustenance for him or his mother, and so she despairs.

Hagar’s response to unwanted change is to believe that nothing good can ever happen to her again. It’s a very understandable response: she has obeyed God in the past, even being willing to go back to an abusive situation, but now it looks as though God has abandoned her completely.

I can identify with Hagar’s response. In my teens and early 20s I visited regularly, and later worked in, a Lutheran conference centre where the staff lived and worked in community. It was there that I first got bitten by the community bug, and also learned about peace and justice issues. In the mid 80s, the Lutherans couldn’t afford to keep the place on any more, and they sold it to a consortium of Christian families who were going to run it as a commercial conference centre. This was a big bereavement for me, as it was a place that had been deeply significant for me and formed my faith in many ways. It also happened close to the time when the minister who had baptized me, who was also a big formative influence, died very suddenly on the street at the age of 57.

Several years later, after I had got married and moved to Muswell Hill, Ed and I discovered the Mennonites, and it was as if God had given me back the relationship to an intentional community, and the style of Christian faith, that I had encountered years before among the Lutherans. But now God seems to be taking away a huge element of that situation again. I could be pardoned, like Hagar, for wondering what on earth God is up to.

Change can be highly traumatic, especially when several changes come at once. Hagar had lost her job, her home and it seemed she was about to lose her precious child.

But now we’re going to hear what happened next.

Genesis 21:17-19

So God meets Hagar, for the second time. This time God provides for both her and her son, not only for their immediate needs but for their future. It may not be the future she has envisaged for him, but the earlier promises to her still stand; Ishmael is still a son of Abraham, and he has a place in God’s purposes.

We could see Hagar, then, as an example of despairing when unwanted change happens. Yet she finds that despite her lack of trust, God does actually provide for her both physically and spiritually. Change comes, but God remains faithful.

A side note here. I’m always a little suspicious when people or hymns declare that God never changes. It’s often an excuse for blocking any change in the way we worship or serve God. Actually the Old Testament is full of examples of God changing his mind, not least in the story of Abraham, where God agrees to spare Sodom if there are ten righteous people there. But one thing we can say is that God never changes in his or her loving attitude towards us. Sometimes God’s love may be expressed in events which seem negative to us - but it doesn’t mean God has stopped loving us. It may just mean God is giving us freedom to choose, or allowing us to have experiences that train us in Christlikeness.

Back to Lot and Hagar. What can we draw out of these two characters’ stories for ourselves? I think we can say that when change comes, whether we have chosen it or not, we need to accept it as change. We should neither try to minimise its impact as Lot does, or treat it as a catastrophe as Hagar does. The old hymn says ‘Change and decay in all around I see’, but I don’t see why we should have such a negative view of change. Why not ‘change and growth in all I see’? Maybe I’ll write a new version of that hymn with those words in it.

Genesis 13:5-13

Now Lot, who went with Abram, also had flocks and herds and tents, 6so that the land could not support both of them living together; for their possessions were so great that they could not live together, 7and there was strife between the herders of Abram’s livestock and the herders of Lot’s livestock...Then Abram said to Lot, “Let there be no strife between you and me, and between your herders and my herders; for we are kindred. 9Is not the whole land before you? Separate yourself from me. If you take the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if you take the right hand, then I will go to the left.” 10Lot looked about him, and saw that the plain of the Jordan was well watered everywhere like the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt, in the direction of Zoar; this was before the Lord had destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. 11So Lot chose for himself all the plain of the Jordan, and Lot journeyed eastward; thus they separated from each other. 12Abram settled in the land of Canaan, while Lot settled among the cities of the Plain and moved his tent as far as Sodom. 13Now the people of Sodom were wicked, great sinners against the Lord.

Ezekiel 16:49

This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy.

Genesis 21:8-16

Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, playing with her son Isaac. 10So she said to Abraham, “Cast out this slave woman with her son; for the son of this slave woman shall not inherit along with my son Isaac.” 11The matter was very distressing to Abraham on account of his son. 12But God said to Abraham, “Do not be distressed because of the boy and because of your slave woman; whatever Sarah says to you, do as she tells you, for it is through Isaac that offspring shall be named for you. 13As for the son of the slave woman, I will make a nation of him also, because he is your offspring.” 14So Abraham rose early in the morning, and took bread and a skin of water, and gave it to Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, along with the child, and sent her away. And she departed, and wandered about in the wilderness of Beer-sheba.
15When the water in the skin was gone, she cast the child under one of the bushes. 16Then she went and sat down opposite him a good way off, about the distance of a bowshot; for she said, “Do not let me look on the death of the child.” And as she sat opposite him, she lifted up her voice and wept.

Genesis 21:17-19

And God heard the voice of the boy; and the angel of God called to Hagar from heaven, and said to her, “What troubles you, Hagar? Do not be afraid; for God has heard the voice of the boy where he is. 18Come, lift up the boy and hold him fast with your hand, for I will make a great nation of him.” 19Then God opened her eyes and she saw a well of water. She went, and filled the skin with water, and gave the boy a drink.